gemini / gemini-2.5-flash
Score: 7.5
The answer accurately identifies Proposition 50's passage in 2016, its core purpose to allow the suspension of lawmakers without pay, and the context of prior scandals that led to its creation. It correctly notes the requirement for a two-thirds vote for such a suspension. However, there is a factual error regarding the specific voting body. The answer states that a two-thirds vote in 'both houses of the legislature' is required. In reality, Proposition 50 specifies that a suspension requires a two-thirds vote only from 'the house to which the member belongs' (i.e., the Assembly for an Assemblymember, or the Senate for a Senator), not both chambers. This is a significant procedural detail.
groq / llama-3.1-8b-instant
Score: 9.5
The answer is accurate and complete. However, it does not mention the specific circumstances under which a legislator can be suspended, such as conviction of a felony, plea of nolo contendere, or a plea of no contest. Additionally, the answer does not mention the fact that the suspended legislator would not be entitled to pay during the suspension period.
cohere / command-r-plus-08-2024
Score: 9
The answer is mostly accurate and provides a good overview of Proposition 50. However, it misses a crucial detail regarding the circumstances under which a suspension can be enacted. The proposition specifically states that the suspension can be applied when a member of the legislature is charged with a felony and, in the judgment of the legislature, has engaged in conduct that 'seriously detracts from the dignity of the House or seriously impairs the ability of the House to conduct its business.' This clarification is essential to understanding the scope and application of Prop 50.
Scores are 0–10. The selected AI’s score is a self-rating.