Answer:
anthropic / claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929
NYC and LA real estate markets differ significantly. NYC has higher median home prices (around $700K-$1M+ in desirable areas) with condos and co-ops dominating due to limited space. The market emphasizes vertical living and walkability. LA's median prices are somewhat lower ($800K-$900K) but vary widely by neighborhood, with single-family homes more common due to sprawl. NYC offers better public transit, reducing car dependency, while LA requires vehicle ownership. NYC's market tends to be more volatile with faster price swings, while LA shows steadier appreciation. Rental yields are often higher in NYC due to strong demand. Both markets are expensive compared to national averages, attract international buyers, and have been impacted by remote work trends post-pandemic, with some migration to suburbs. Tax structures differ significantly, with California's Prop 13 capping property tax increases unlike NYC's system.
gemini / gemini-2.5-flash
Score: 6
The most significant error is the comparison of median home prices. The answer states NYC has "higher median home prices" (e.g., $700K-$1M+) but then lists LA's median prices as "somewhat lower ($800K-$900K)", which is contradictory. Furthermore, current market data generally indicates that LA's median home prices are *higher* than NYC's overall median (across all five boroughs). This fundamental inaccuracy undermines a key comparative point. Additionally, the price ranges for NYC could be more precise, distinguishing between Manhattan and the broader NYC market. The claim about NYC's market being "more volatile" with "faster price swings" compared to LA's "steadier appreciation" is a generalization that may not consistently hold true across all market cycles.
openai / gpt-4o-mini
Score: 8
The answer provides a good comparison but has issues with accuracy. Median home prices for LA are inaccurately stated as $800K-$900K; they are often lower, around $700K-$1M depending on neighborhoods. NYC's prices of $700K-$1M+ in desirable areas are too broad and may mislead; they can exceed $1.5M in prime areas. It is correct that NYC has higher rental yields, but the volatility of the market should be nuanced — both markets are influenced by different factors. Referring to 'strong demand' for rentals in NYC could be more detailed, as it can vary based on economic conditions. While Prop 13 does cap increases, the explanation lacks context regarding how NYC property taxes work. Including more recent data or trends, especially post-pandemic migration patterns, would sharpen the analysis.
cohere / command-r-plus-08-2024
Score: 9
The answer is mostly accurate and comprehensive, covering key differences between the two markets. It correctly highlights the higher median home prices in NYC, the prevalence of condos/co-ops, and the focus on vertical living. The description of LA's market, with lower median prices and a mix of housing types, is also on point. The critique accurately notes the better public transit in NYC and the impact on car ownership. The volatility and rental yield comparison is insightful. The mention of international buyers and remote work trends is relevant. However, the critique could be enhanced by providing more specific data on price differences and rental yields to offer a more precise comparison. Additionally, while tax structures do differ, the impact of California's Prop 13 on property tax increases is more nuanced and may not fully explain the differences in tax structures between the two cities.
Scores are 0–10. The selected AI’s score is a self-rating.
